All manuscripts submitted to Eteranova: Journal of Engineering and Technological Innovation undergo a double-blind peer review process. In this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other to ensure impartiality.

Review Stages:

1. Initial Screening:
   The manuscript is reviewed by the editorial team for scope alignment, formatting, and adherence to submission guidelines and publication ethics.

2. Plagiarism Check:
   Submissions passing the initial check will be screened using plagiarism detection software (e.g., Turnitin). Manuscripts with a high similarity score will be returned.

3. Reviewer Assignment:
   The manuscript is assigned to two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

4. Peer Review Process:
   Reviewers are given 2–4 weeks to complete their review. Recommendations may include:

   • Accept without revision

   • Accept with minor revision

   • Accept with major revision

   • Reject

5. Revision by Authors:
   Authors are expected to revise their manuscript within 7–14 days, depending on the level of revision required.

6. Re-review (if necessary):
   Revised manuscripts may be sent back to reviewers for a second round of evaluation.

7. Final Decision:
   The final publication decision is made by the editor based on reviewer recommendations. This decision is final.

Reviewer Evaluation Criteria:

• Originality and scholarly contribution

• Relevance to journal scope

• Clarity of objectives and methodology

• Validity of data and analysis

• Quality of writing and presentation

This journal is committed to a fair, transparent, and timely peer review process.